Legal Opinion

Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. Sealy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 14, 1979No. 77-707, 77-707X and 77-723PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant/appellant, The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (A P) appeals from a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff/appellee, James Sealy, $185,000 as compensation for property damage and personal injuries which he alleged were proximately caused by the negligence of a truck driver employed by A P in parking an A P truck on a paved improved shoulder of a busy street within the police jurisdiction of Mobile, Alabama. A P contends the trial judge should have directed a verdict in its favor because the evidence was insufficient, as a matter of law, to prove its truck driver's…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Ex Parte DowlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. NorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. K.S. v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API