Legal Opinion
House of Pasta, Inc. v. Mayo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 13, 1982No. 184PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUGERMAN, Judge:
The question we address in this Appeal is whether a jury returned a verdict in both or only one of two civil actions consolidated and assertedly tried together. The lower court found that a verdict in only one of the two actions had been returned and thereupon molded the verdict accordingly.
From the record we observe that Appellees, Charles A. Mayo and Vincent G. Corradino, leased a building to Appellant, House of Pasta, Inc. on October 20, 1971 for a term of ten years. On or about May 22, 1975, the premises were destroyed by fire, and on the same day, Appellant vacated the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Whistler Sportswear, Inc. v. RulloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kardibin v. Associated HardwareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Warren v. Mosites Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Buchecker v. Reading Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Groh v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tyus v. RestaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- FRANCIS J. BERNHARDT III, PC v. NeedlemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Mendralla v. Weaver Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Jonnet Development Corp. v. Dietrich Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Krock v. ChroustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.