Legal Opinion

State v. Purdy

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1979No. 4468PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether the “dual capacity doctrine” permits a negligence action by an employee against an employer, in this case the State of Alaska.

Respondent has received benefits under the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Act, but has filed an action alleging that the state failed to properly maintain the highway on which the accident occurred.

The State moved for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff’s suit was barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Act, since her injury occurred in the course and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Elliott v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rosales v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. McAlister v. Methodist Hospital of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gordon v. Burgess Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Christensen v. NCH Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Deller v. NaymickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Henning v. General Motors Assembly DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API