Legal Opinion
Oelrich v. Schlagels, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 29, 1988No. C5-88-61, CX-88-69PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Jack Roach Ford and its insurer, American Mutual Insurance Company, appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) holding that a person injured while participating in on-the-job training as a part of a rehabilitation program following a prior work injury is entitled to workers compensation benefits from the trainer. We affirm.
Duane J. Oelrich sustained a lower back injury on December 17, 1980, while working as a mechanic for Schlagels, Inc. He was paid temporary total, medical, and permanent partial disability benefits for 20% of the spine by Schlagels’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Darvell v. Paul A. Laurence Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Judd v. Sanatorium Commission of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Hagberg v. Colonial & Pacific Frigidways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Krause v. Trustees of Hamline University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Egeland v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walls v. North Mississippi Med. CenterMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Catherine Lyons v. Chittenden Central Supervisory UnionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Alcozer v. North Country Food BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Alcozer v. North Country Food BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Catherine Lyons v. Chittenden Central Supervisory UnionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.