Legal Opinion

Rosner v. Michigan Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1991No. Docket 125708PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right from a Dickinson Circuit Court order granting summary disposition to plaintiff. MCR 2.116(C)(10). The court found that, under the no-fault act, plaintiff was an "occupant” of the insured vehicle and, therefore, was entitled to recover personal protection benefits from defendant. MCL 500.3111; MSA 24.13111. We reverse and grant summary disposition to defendant.

On October 29, 1986, plaintiff was driving a semitrailer truck in Wisconsin when the truck jackknifed, injuring him. The tractor and the trailer were separately owned and insured. The tractor was owned by a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parks v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Joy Management Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Royal Globe Insurance v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hathcox v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Hackley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. League General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Gentry v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Auto Club Insurance v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Nelson v. L&S Affiliates, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
  5. Timothy McAllister v. Mike Vuich IIIMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API