Rosner v. Michigan Mutual Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals as of right from a Dickinson Circuit Court order granting summary disposition to plaintiff. MCR 2.116(C)(10). The court found that, under the no-fault act, plaintiff was an "occupant” of the insured vehicle and, therefore, was entitled to recover personal protection benefits from defendant. MCL 500.3111; MSA 24.13111. We reverse and grant summary disposition to defendant.
On October 29, 1986, plaintiff was driving a semitrailer truck in Wisconsin when the truck jackknifed, injuring him. The tractor and the trailer were separately owned and insured. The tractor was owned by a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parks v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Joy Management Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Hathcox v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hackley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilson v. League General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gentry v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Auto Club Insurance v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Nelson v. L&S Affiliates, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
- Timothy McAllister v. Mike Vuich IIIMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019