Legal Opinion

Gentry v. Allstate Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1994No. Docket 162917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, P.J.

Defendant appeals as of right from a circuit court order granting summary disposition for plaintiffs pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10). By granting plaintiffs’ motion, the court, in effect, held that plaintiffs were entitled to recover no-fault personal injury protection (pip) benefits because they were "occupants” of the vehicle under the no-fault act and that they were entitled to recover uninsured motorist benefits under the insurance policy issued by defendant because they were "occupying” the vehicle within the meaning of the policy. We affirm.

On December 20, 1991, plaintiffs were riding in a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thornton v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Michigan Mutual Insurance v. DowellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adkins v. MeadorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Genthner v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance v. HarveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Cipri v. Bellingham Frozen Foods, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. AMY v. MIC General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API