Parks v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.
The issue in this case is whether the no-fault act requires an employee’s personal no-fault insurer, the employee’s self-insured employer, or the Assigned Claims Facility to provide personal protection insurance benefits when a personally insured employee is injured while occupying an employer-owned vehicle that is not required to be registered in Michigan.
Involved in the resolution of this question are §§ 3101(1), 3102(1), and 3114(1), (3) of the no-fault act.1 MCL 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq. Section 3101(1) states, in part, "The owner or registrant of a motor vehicle required to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Lee v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Kelly v. Inter-City Truck Lines, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mills v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- People v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Glover v. Parole BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Clevenger v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.