Legal Opinion

Parks v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1986No. Docket Nos. 75437, 75438, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.

The issue in this case is whether the no-fault act requires an employee’s personal no-fault insurer, the employee’s self-insured employer, or the Assigned Claims Facility to provide personal protection insurance benefits when a personally insured employee is injured while occupying an employer-owned vehicle that is not required to be registered in Michigan.

Involved in the resolution of this question are §§ 3101(1), 3102(1), and 3114(1), (3) of the no-fault act.1 MCL 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq. Section 3101(1) states, in part, "The owner or registrant of a motor vehicle required to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lee v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Kelly v. Inter-City Truck Lines, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Mills v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Glover v. Parole BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Clevenger v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API