Legal Opinion
Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 31, 2003No. C 98-266PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
On January 23, 1998, plaintiff commenced this action for patent infringement of two United States patents to which he holds the rights: US Patent Nos 5,694,603 (’603 patent) and 5,694,604 (’604 patent). See Doc # 1. On January 24, 2002, the court held a claim construction hearing. See Doc # 354. The court issued its claim construction order on April 30, 2002, which prompted the parties to file or renew the motions now pending. See Doc # 365.
Those motions include: (1) defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment of invalidity and lack of priority under 35 USC §§…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shuffle Master, Inc. v. MP GAMES LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2008
- Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- In Re Columbia University Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Biogen Idec MA Inc. v. TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CITY OF NEW YORKDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Cancer Research Technology v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.