Legal Opinion
Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 30, 2009No. Civil Action 06-491-MPTPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is a patent case. On August 8, 2006 Cordance Corporation (“Cordance”) filed suit alleging that Amazon.com Inc. and Amazon Web Services, LLC (collectively, “Amazon”) infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 6,757,710 (“the '710 patent”), 6,044,-205 (“the '205 patent”), 5,862,325 (“the '325 patent”), and 6,088,717 (“the '717 patent”). 1 On October 23, 2006 Amazon filed its answer asserting numerous counterclaims and defenses, including a counterclaim of patent infringement of its U.S. Patent No. 6,269,369 (“the '369 patent”).…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- International Business Machines Corp. v. Priceline Group Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- Ormco Corp. v. ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Battaglia Management, Inc. v. AbramowiczDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Catilina Nominees Proprietary Ltd. v. Stericycle, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Natera, Inc. v. ArcherDX, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.