Legal Opinion
Felice v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 19, 1985No. 6821-8-IIIPublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McInturff, A.C.J.
—This case involves a dispute between an attorney, Victor Felice, and his malpractice insurance carrier, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The issues concern the scope of coverage and the duty an insur- anee company has to appeal an unfavorable trial court decision. Mr. Felice claims the trial court erred in granting St. Paul summary judgment. We affirm.
In August 1981, Charles Kreck, 1 a longtime friend of Verna Cambern, an 86-year-old widow, advised Mr. Felice that Mrs. Cambern's life was in danger, her assets were being squandered by family members, and he was of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Ralph Williams' Northwest Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.