Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Office of the Attorney General

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 27, 2006No. 33333-3-IIPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Daphne Clarke appeals the trial court’s discovery rulings and its summary judgment order in favor of the State of Washington on her claims for hostile work environment and discrimination. Clarke argues that the trial court erred when it (1) granted the State’s motion to compel production of her tax returns, (2) denied her motions to compel discovery, and (3) granted summary judgment in favor of the State. We affirm.

Van Deren, J.

FACTS

A. Employment History

¶2 Daphne Clarke began working for the State of Washington in 1995. From 1995 to 1998, she worked with several State agencies as a clerk,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Brand v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Brand v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Antonius v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Davis v. West One Automotive GroupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Davis v. West One Automotive GroupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Clarke v. STATE, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API