Broyles v. Thurston County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Penoyar, A.C. J.
¶1 Thurston County (County) appeals from a jury verdict holding the County liable based on hostile work environment and retaliation claims. The County asserts that (1) it is not liable for the acts of the prosecuting attorney, Edward Holm; (2) the trial court erred in allowing evidence outside the statute of limitations, in not applying collateral estoppel, and in allowing marital discrimination evidence; (3) the trial court erred in not allowing evidence detailing a meeting in which the plaintiffs and another deputy prosecutor consulted an attorney; (4) the jury’s verdict was…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Sauers v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Yakima County v. Yakima Herald-RepublicWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- West v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.