Legal Opinion

Jones v. Evans

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1907No. Civ. No. 328PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. A. Powell, Geo. R. Williams, and W. A. Dow, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action on two promissory notes, made by J. W. Evans, payable to the order of the Domestic Sewing Machine Company. That company, before maturity, indorsed these notes, and delivered them to plaintiff. Thereafter, and before maturity, both notes were indorsed by plaintiff and discounted at certain banks. Defendants failed to meet these notes when they fell due. They were duly protested, and the plaintiff was compelled to pay the amounts due thereon. Defendants failed to reimburse plaintiff for such payment, and this action was brought. A trial was had only against the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commercial Savings Bank v. HornbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Crocker-Woolworth National Bank v. CarleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ehrlich v. EwaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Farmers and Merchants Bank v. CopseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. SlyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Commercial Security Co. v. Modesto Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Nevada-Douglas Consolidated Copper Co. v. BerryhillNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Stern v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API