Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baker v. Coast to Coast Manpower, L.L.C.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2011No. 2010-0211PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} Today, we are asked to determine whether the surgical removal of the lens of an eye in the course of treatment for a workplace injury entitles the injured worker to compensation pursuant to R.C. 4123.57(B) for a total loss of sight.

{¶ 2} We decline to adopt a bright-line rule that a claimant is entitled to an award for a total loss of vision under R.C. 4123.57(B) any time the natural lens or cornea of the eye is surgically removed as a result of a workplace injury. The court of appeals below properly calculated the loss of sight based on the percentage of vision actually lost as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Walker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. AutoZone, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. General Electric Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Beyer v. Autoneum N. Am. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State ex rel. Cogan v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State ex rel. Bowman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Beyer v. Autoneum N. Am., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Cogan v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API