State ex rel. Baker v. Coast to Coast Manpower, L.L.C.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} Today, we are asked to determine whether the surgical removal of the lens of an eye in the course of treatment for a workplace injury entitles the injured worker to compensation pursuant to R.C. 4123.57(B) for a total loss of sight.
{¶ 2} We decline to adopt a bright-line rule that a claimant is entitled to an award for a total loss of vision under R.C. 4123.57(B) any time the natural lens or cornea of the eye is surgically removed as a result of a workplace injury. The court of appeals below properly calculated the loss of sight based on the percentage of vision actually lost as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Walker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. AutoZone, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. General Electric Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Beyer v. Autoneum N. Am. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- State ex rel. Cogan v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- State ex rel. Bowman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State ex rel. Beyer v. Autoneum N. Am., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State ex rel. Cogan v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.