State ex rel. Walker v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocheb, J.
The sole issue before this court is whether “loss” as used in E. C. 4123.57(C) includes “loss of use” and not merely “loss by severance.” “Loss” was first defined by the Supreme Court in State, ex rel. Bohan, v. Indus. Comm. (1946), 146 Ohio St. 618, a 4-to-3 decision involving a claimant who had lost the use of his hand and wrist and sought to receive benefits under the predecessor of E. C. 4123.57(C) for the loss of the entire hand. The second paragraph of the syllabus in Bohan reads:
“The word loss’ as used in Section 1465-80, General Code, and therein applied to certain members of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Gassmann v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Virginia Oak Flooring Co. v. ChrisleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Stanley v. United Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- State ex rel. Benton v. Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- Clark's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State ex rel. Maurer v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Bosch v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Alcoa Building Products v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Moorehead v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. General Refractories Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.