Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bowman v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2020No. 19AP-109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Bowman v. Indus. Comm.,

2020-Ohio-5343.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT The State ex rel. Cami R. Bowman, : Relator, : v. : No. 19AP-109 Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Respondents. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on November 19, 2020 On brief: Charles Zamora Co. L.P.A., and Charles Zamora, for relator. On brief: Dave Yost, Attorney General, and Natalie J. Tackett, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. On brief: Perez & Morris, L.L.C., Juan Jose Perez, Richard A. Hernandez, and Julian Heinrich, for respondent Wexner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Lewis v. Diamond Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bowman v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State ex rel. Wisner v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API