Legal Opinion

Baker v. Hammett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1909No. 119PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from the United States Court for the Western District of the Indian Territory. Action by J. N. Baker against Ellis H. Hammett and others, copartners, trading as the Coweta Realty Company. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DüNN, J.

This action was brought in the Hnited States Court for the Western District of the Indian Territory at Muskogee by plaintiff in error against the defendants in error for the purpose of canceling certain conveyances alleged to be clouds on his title to the W. % of the S. E. % and the S. E. 14 of the S. E. % of section 35, township 18 N, range 16 E.; the land being the surplus allotment of a mixed-blood citizen of the Creek Nation. Both plaintiff and defendants hold conveyances from the said allottee, and the answer contained a cross-complaint asking for the cancellation of the deeds…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Territory of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Taylor v. CaffreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tribal Development Co. v. White Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Axelrod v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Durkee v. HazanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API