Legal Opinion

Durkee v. Hazan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1968No. 40673PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

This appeal presents a third phase of variant litigation involving rights and interests in the NW/4 of Sec. 20, Twp. 1SN, R. 13E, Okmulgee County, Oklahoma. See Supreme Court No. 39,738, Henry et al. v. Barnett, Judge, etc. application for writ of mandamus denied without opinion, July 18, 1961. Henry et al. v. Ionic Pet. Co., Inc., Okl., 391 P.2d 792, affirming judgment granting injunction against landowners, plaintiffs in this case, for interference with right of ingress and egress to producing oil leases here involved.

Appeal is by original record composed of partial record of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Indiana Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Waggoner v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Cotner v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Capps v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Pack v. Santa Fe MineralsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Adolph v. StearnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API