Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of the Monitor Stove Company -the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the district court for Hennepin county and the Honorable Charles S. J elley, one of the judges thereof, to review the proceedings of that court in an action brought under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, by Pauline Stansberry, widow of Frank J. Stansberry, employe, and others against relator, employer.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
Frank J. . Stansberry was a traveling salesman for defendant company. .while in the Frederic Hotel at Grand Forks, North Dakota, a fire broke out at night and 'Stansberry was killed while attempting to escape. His widow and minor children made claim for compensation under the Minnesota Workmen’s Compensation statute. The claim was allowed. Defendant appeals.
1. Defendant is an Ohio corporation. It manufactures and sells furnaces. It maintains a permanent branch office, warehouse and agency in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The sale and distribution of furnaces in the northwest, including Minnesota…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Johnson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District Court of Rice CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Souza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Alexander Film Company v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Harivel v. Hall-Thompson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Walker v. Speeder MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.