Steiner v. Zwickey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants, W. F. Zwickey and J. E. Flint, from a judgment of the district court for Eamsey county,( where the action was tried by.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendants, W. F. Zwickey and J. E. Flint, from a judgment of the district court for Eamsey county,( where the action was tried by. Simons, J. The action was begun October 3, 1887. The additional findings requested by defendants and referred to in the opinion were to the effect that the defendant Flint, and the Youngmans, and Hintermister (mentioned in the opinion) were interested with defendant Zwickey in the contract with plaintiffs at the time it was made, and were also interested with him in his contract of June 17, 1887, with White and Doyle for the land which he agreed to…
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The plaintiffs, as copartners in the purchase and sale of the real estate and equitable interests herein involved, having equal shares therein, brought this action to compel a reconveyance of the fee of one parcel of the land from defendant Flint, and an assignment or transfer of an equitable right or interest in the other parcel from the defendant Zwiekey. These defendants had obtained the title in fee to one tract, and an equitable right in the other, valued together at $1,075, in part-payment for other real estate, which defendant Zwiekey had by a contract in writing, of date July 18,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bigler v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hussey v. RoquemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
3Cited by17 opinions
- Paynesville Land Co. v. GrabowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Kelly v. ThueySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Buswell v. O. W. Kerr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Weitzel v. LeysonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Gottschalk v. MeisenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.