Legal Opinion
Lundgren v. National Bank of Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1987No. S-784, S-1150, S-933 and S-1161PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
I. BACKGROUND.
These consolidated appeals arise from a judicial foreclosure suit instituted by appel-lee, National Bank of Alaska (NBA) against two debtor corporations, J. McCall, Inc. (JMI) and Lundgren Pacific Construction Company (LPCC), both owned by John R. McCall. The corporations had guaranteed each other’s debt to NBA, the total of which was over $2 million. NBA sought to foreclose on several pieces of property owned by JMI or LPCC on which NBA held deeds of trust. The suit also named, among other defendants, James Lundgren and Henry F. Mogg, each of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Emporia State Bank & Trust Co. v. MounkesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- National Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. BlankenshipDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1959
- Akamine & Sons, Ltd. v. American Security BankHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- First v. ByrneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In the Matter of Allen J. Kazmierczak and Carol A. Kazmierczak, Debtors. Appeal of Paul Swanson, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Inman v. InmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Fischer v. First International BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Foxborough Savings Bank v. Ballarino (In Re Ballarino)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Mogg v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.