Legal Opinion

Fischer v. First International Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 2003No. D040165PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AARON, J.

Introduction

This matter is before the court on two separate appeals. Plaintiffs Karl and Pamela Fischer appeal from a summary judgment order and final judgment in favor of defendant First International Bank (FIB or the bank). Defendant Investors Title Company (ITC or escrow company) appeals from a subsequent order granting the Fischers’ motion for new trial as to ITC.

The Fishers’ appeal presents the following question: When a bank enters into a written loan agreement that specifies the collateral for two different loans, and does not state that the loans will be…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Bruni v. DidionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  4. Saterbak v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Ambriz v. KelegianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API