Legal Opinion

Inman v. Inman

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2003No. S-10238PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Homer Inman appeals the superior court's grant of Civil Rule 60(b) relief from judgment and its subsequent award of thirty percent of his civil service pension to his former wife, Peggy. Because the superior court lacked personal jurisdiction over Peggy at the time of the divorce, the original property division was void under Civil Rule 60(b)(4) and the court's subsequent award to Peggy of thirty percent of the pension as of the date she filed the motion was appropriate. In addition, the superior court's setting of the date of separation as the date…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. National Bank of Alaska v. J. B. L. & K. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dingeman v. DingemanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hanlon v. HanlonAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Faulkner v. GoldfussAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hanson v. HansonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bouton v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  3. Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Helton v. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Dundas v. DundasAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API