Legal Opinion

City of Kansas City v. Seaman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 11, 1916No. 20,567PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutchings, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The appellant was convicted and fined in the police court of Kansas City, Kan., for carrying on the occupation and business of a laundry within the city without having obtained a license under the provisions of a city ordinance. The district court affirmed the conviction, and he appeals.

The appellant resided in Kansas City, Mo., and was in the employ of the Fern Laundry Company, a corporation located in and doing business as a steam laundry in Kansas City, Mo. Among the customers of the laundry company are people who reside in Kansas City,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. W. W. Cargill Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Delamater v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. City of Kinsley v. DyerlySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fernan v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. United States v. Spotless Dollar Cleaners, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
  3. People v. VechioneNew York Court of Special Session · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API