Legal Opinion

Fernan v. City of Palo Alto

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1942No. Civ. 6636PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMSTOCK, J. pro tem.

Plaintiffs prosecute this appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for an injunction seeking to restrain the defendants from enforcing an ordinance of the city of Palo Alto requiring the payment of license fees in connection with the conduct of a laundry business.

It was stipulated that all of the allegations in the First Amended Complaint are true, except the allegation that the ordinance in question is illegal and void.

The plaintiffs are copartners engaged in the laundry business. The plant where their washing and ironing are done is located in the city…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Bueneman v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Matter of Application of HinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Belridge Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Belridge Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. City of San Mateo v. MullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API