Legal Opinion
United States v. Spotless Dollar Cleaners, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
The court is here asked to restrain defendant, pendente lite, from performing certain retail dry-eleaning and dyeing services within New York Trade Area No. 12, which includes this city, at prices that are below certain mínimums established for such services under article VI, section 3 (h), of the Code of Fair Competition for the Cleaning and Dyeing Trade, approved by the President on November 8,1933.
Jurisdiction is invoked under the provisions of title 1, of the National Industrial Recovery Act (Public No. 67, 73d Congress [15 USCA § 791 et seq.]), approved June 16,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kent Stores of New Jersey v. WilentzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1936
- United States v. MillsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1934
- Richmond Hosiery Mills v. CampDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1934
- United States v. GearhartDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1934
- United States v. SchechterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.