Legal Opinion

Foard v. Jarman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1989No. 8822SC587PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Plaintiff filed this medical malpractice action to recover damages for alleged lack of informed consent, fraud, and negligence. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals.

The undisputed evidence at the hearing on the summary judgment motion tends to show: Plaintiff, Rebecca Foard, went to see defendant, Dr. Wayne Jarman, about her weight problem. Plaintiff and defendant discussed the possibility of plaintiff undergoing gastric reduction surgery, a procedure which causes weight loss by limiting the amount of food a person can consume at one…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foard v. JarmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Foard v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API