Legal Opinion
Foard v. Jarman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided May 2, 1989No. 8822SC587Published
1Opinion of the Court
378 S.E.2d 571 (1989)
Rebecca FOARD
v.
Wayne JARMAN, M.D.
No. 8822SC587.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
May 2, 1989.
Hall and Brooks by John E. Hall and W. Andrew Jennings, Wilkesboro, for plaintiff-appellant.
Wade and Carmichael by R.C. Carmichael, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellee.
GREENE, Judge.
Plaintiff filed this medical malpractice action to recover damages for alleged lack of informed consent, fraud, and negligence. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals.
The undisputed evidence at the hearing on the summary judgment motion tends to show:…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.