Foard v. Jarman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Justice.
The sole issue is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the trial court erroneously granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether defendant obtained plaintiff’s informed consent before performing surgery upon plaintiff. We hold that defendant made a sufficient showing of informed consent to prevail on summary judgment, and we accordingly reverse the Court of Appeals.
Plaintiff weighed 331 pounds in May 1982 when she consulted defendant about surgical treatments for obesity. She testified on deposition that she had heard of- a surgical…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Nelson v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Foard v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- Howard v. University of Medicine & DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Bowlin v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Goldberg v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Clark v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.