Legal Opinion
Application of National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, Doing Business as National Distillers Products Co
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 12, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6706PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The Commissioner of Patents, purporting to act under Rule 7 of this court, 35 U.S.C.A.Appendix, has filed a Petition for Rehearing of the decision of this court which was rendered herein on August 16, 1961.1 In this petition of some *94327 pages we are told that there are 20 “errors manifest” or matters “overlooked or misapprehended” which are explained and argued at great length and in considerable detail.
This petition amounts to a reargument of the case which was more concisely argued in the Commissioner’s main brief of but 21 pages. The petition presents nothing new, nothing that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Schering & Glatz, Inc. v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Windsor Beverages, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Avon Shoe Co. v. David Crystal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Application of Laskin Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Matal v. TamSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Application of Beatrice Foods Co. Application of Fairway Foods, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Massey Junior College, Inc. v. Fashion Institute of TechnologyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Rosso and Mastracco, Incorporated v. Giant Food Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.