Legal Opinion

Application of Fleet-Wing Corporation (Two Cases)

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1951No. Patent Appeals 5752, 5753PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Judge.

These are two appeals from decisions of the Commissioner of Patents of the United States Patent Office, 80 USPQ 177 and 80 USPQ 179, affirming the action of the Examiner of Trade-Marks, in refusing to register the mark “Fleet-Wing” for use on automobile storage batteries and on automobile tires and tubes because of the prior registrations of the words “Fleet” and “Wing,” respectively, on identical goods.

The mark “Fleet,” registration No. 386,-987, was issued to the Gilmore Oil Company April 29, 1941, for use on storage batteries; the mark “Wing,” registration No. 46533, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Laskin Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. Lever Bros. Co. v. Sitroux Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Spiegel Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. Carmel Wine Co. v. California WineryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1911

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Application of Beatrice Foods Co. Application of Fairway Foods, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Crown Industrial Products Company v. Crown Central Petroleum CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. I. Posner, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. Application of Ada Milling CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Application of Ada Milling CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API