Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VINSON, Associate Justice.
Appellant was plaintiff in the District Court in what is commonly known as a *386Section 4915 proceeding.1 Previously, appellant had applied to the Patent Office for registration of the trade-mark “Everybody’s Weekly”, the name given to the magazine supplement section of the Philadelphia Inquirer’s Sunday newspaper.
Inasmuch as the construction of the applicable statutory provisions is the whole of this case, we set forth the pertinent language of the Act immediately in order that the four previous determinations in this case may be understood as recited:
“[That] no mark…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- McGraw-Hill Pub. Co. v. American Aviation Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schering & Glatz, Inc. v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Application of Laskin Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Viscol Co. v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Alligator Co. v. Larus & Brother Co. IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Alligator Co. v. Larus & Brother Co. IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.