Legal Opinion

Law, Co. v. Smith

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1908No. 1941PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from District Court, First District; J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by Albert A. Law, as county attorney of Cache county, against Thomas H. Smith. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEeick, J.

On April 25, 1907, appellant, as tbe county attorney of Cache county, Utah, filed an accusation in writing against respondent, the duly elected, qualified, and acting sheriff of said county, to remove him from said office. The proceedings were commenced and conducted under the provisions of the following sections of the Compiled Laws of Utah, 1907. Section 4565 provides:

“All officers not liable to impeachment shall he subject to removal for high crimes, misdemeanors, or malfeasance in office, as in this chapter provided.”

Section 4566 is as follows:

“An accusation in writing against any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. LazarusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  2. Lesher v. GetmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Skeen v. CraigUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Minkler v. State ex rel. SmithersNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Skeen v. PaineUtah Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Daugherty v. EllisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Atwood v. Cox, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People ex rel. Attorney General v. CassidaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API