Legal Opinion

Skeen v. Paine

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1907No. 1835PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; J. A Howell, Judge. Proceeding by J. D. Skeen against Robert B. Paine. From a judgment for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This proceeding was instituted by plaintiff, respondent in this court, against the defendant, the appellant here, under section 4580, Rev. St. 1898, to remove appellant from the office of city councilman of the city of Ogden.

The facts Upon which the proceeding is based are similar to those stated and passed upon by this court in the two eases of Skeen v. Craig, 86 Pac. 487, and Skeen v. Chambers, 86 Pac. 492. We shall therefore refer to- those cases for the facts, except in so far as matters not presented in those cases are involved in this case. We, shall also' abide by the law laid down in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Coleman v. RoseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Skeen v. CraigUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Childs v. DartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Skeen v. ChambersUtah Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Barker v. MeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Law, Co. v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Patterick v. Carbon Water Conservancy Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API