Legal Opinion

Minkler v. State ex rel. Smithers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Weaver, J. cited: State v. Preston, 34 Wis., 6751 United States v. Railroad Cars, 1 Abb., 196. Kendall v. Stohes, 3 Howard (U. S.), 87. Ramsey v. Riley, 13 Ohio, 157. Stewart v. Southard, 17 Ohio, 402. cited: Heaton v. Hodges, 30 Am. Dec., 737. Diehl v. Zanger, 39 Mich., 604. 2 Whart. Grim. Law, sec. 1245. Wallace v. New York, 18 How. Pr., 169.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

A complaint was made to the board of county commissioners against the plaintiff in error for willful mal-administration in his office of county surveyor. He was tried and found guilty of this charge, and removed from office. The cause was removed to the district court on error, when the finding and judgment of the board of county commissioners were affirmed, and is now before this court on error to the district court. The only substantial error assigned is, that the action of the board of county commissioners is not sustained by the evidence in the case.

*182Section 1 of article 2 of chapter 18,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Coite v. LynesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. EllisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Law, Co. v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People, Ex Rel. Johnson v. CoffeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Mathews v. HedlundNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API