People ex rel. Attorney General v. Cassiday
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
This is an original proceeding, in quo ivarranto, in the name of the people, on relation of the attorney general, requiring the respondents, holding and exercising the duties of the office of county commis.sioners of the city and county of Denver, to answer and show hy what authority they assume to hold and exercise the duties of such office. Under the issues, as framed hy the petition and writ and the answer and return thereto, the soundness of the reasoning upon which the conclusions were reached in the case of The People ex rel. Attorney General v. Johnson, 34 Colo. 143, is directly…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- Robinson v. SchenckIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- City of Chicago v. ReevesIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Four-County Metropolitan Capital Improvement District v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- City & County of Denver v. TihenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- People Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- State ex rel. Corry v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1924
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.