Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Wayson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1896PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Replevin by Hugh R. Ryan against Samuel W. Way-son. Both parties bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

It appears from the undisputed facts that on the 14th day of September, 1893, the defendant purchased from the plaintiff a stock of goods in the city of Detroit for an agreed consideration of $2,525. At the time of the purchase defendant paid all but $1,200 of the purchase price, the balance of which was to be paid at the rate of $100 per month, with interest at 7 per cent, per annum, the first payment to be made on the 14th day of October, 1893; but none of the balance of $1,200 was paid by defendant. At the time of the purchase a written contract of sale was drawn up and executed by 'the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thirlby v. RainbowMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Tufts v. D'ArcambalMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Farrah v. BursleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Olin v. LockwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Powers v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sanford v. Gates, Townsend & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McCargar v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Richards v. W. H. Hellen & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API