Legal Opinion

Farrah v. Bursley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Eatou. (Smith, J.) Submitted on briefs March ' 8, 1894. Decided June 2, 1894. Replevin. Plaintiffs bring erior. The facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The only question which we will consider upon this record is whether a justice of the peace may order a return of replevied property where a judgment is rendered in favor of the defendant upon the sole ground that he had a lawful possession at the time the writ issued, because no demand had been made; the plea of the general issue, simply, having been interposed. The circuit court disposed of the case upon the assumption that the record made it possible to infer that the justice’s judgment might have been based upon further facts consistent with defendants’ right to a return, but we think the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boynton v. PageNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Yates v. Fassett & WhitlockNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Ely v. . EhleNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  4. Sparks v. HeritageIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Coit v. WaplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1854

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ryan v. WaysonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. National Cash Register Co. v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Matthews v. ForslundMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API