Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Gates, Townsend & Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1898PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Clarke County; LL. R. Buck, Judge. Replevin by J. R. Sanford against Gates, Townsend & Co. and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtPigott, J.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession of certain hotel furniture of the value of $649.06; that the same is unlawfully held by defendants, after demand therefor; that on October 2, 1893, plaintiff delivered the chattels in controversy to defendant Gates, Townsend & Co., a corporation, under the provisions of a contract entered into on that day between plaintiff and defendant corporation, as follows:

“Helena, Montana, Oct. 2, 1893. I have this day rented of J. R. Sanford the following described goods as per memorandum attached, for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Basey v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Ballard v. . BurgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. George v. TateSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Wilson v. . DeenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Moss v. GoodhartMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Helena Water Works Co. v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Streicher v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Armington v. StelleMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Riddell v. Peck-Williamson Heating & Ventilating Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API