Olin v. Lockwood

Action of replevin. Neither plaintiff nor defendants are the general owners of the goods replevied, but are mortgagees. Plaintiff took them into her possession under the writ against defendants. There is no dis*444pute of fact. Plaintiff had a prior mortgage lien on the property, which the jury found amounted to $611.07, and the defendants’ second mortgage amounted to $376.35. The value of the property was found to be $1,060. The jury also found by their verdict that the property was unlawfully detained by defendants. Upon this verdict, the court directed a judgment to be entered in favor of the…