Legal Opinion

People v. Bruce

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1966No. L. A. 28605PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

Upon conviction of defendant Lenny Bruce of possession of heroin criminal proceedings were suspended, and on June 4, 1963, the court ordered the sheriff to file a petition pursuant to former section 6451 of the Penal Code 1 in order to ascertain whether defendant ‘1 is addicted to the use of narcotic drugs or by reason of repeated use of narcotics is in imminent danger of becoming so addicted.” A petition was filed and a lengthy hearing was held commencing on June 12, 1963, at which defendant was represented by counsel. At the conclusion of the hearing the trial court determined that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In re TrummerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In re RanerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Spackman v. GoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. WhelchelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API