Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1977No. Crim. 19476PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Two years ago we held that a person whom the state seeks to commit to a mental hospital as a “mentally disordered sex offender” (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6300 et seq.) is entitled on several state and federal constitutional grounds to the safeguards of proof beyond a *633reasonable doubt {People v. Burnick (1975) 14 Cal.3d 306 [121 Cal.Rptr. 488, 535 P.2d 352]) and a unanimous verdict {People v. Feagley (1975) 14 Cal.3d 338, 349-358 [121 Cal.Rptr. 509, 535 P.2d 373]). In each case we expressly left open the question whether a person subjected to involuntary commitment proceedings as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Ivan v. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. People v. BurnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. Gary W.California Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API