People v. Thomas
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Two years ago we held that a person whom the state seeks to commit to a mental hospital as a “mentally disordered sex offender” (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6300 et seq.) is entitled on several state and federal constitutional grounds to the safeguards of proof beyond a *633reasonable doubt {People v. Burnick (1975) 14 Cal.3d 306 [121 Cal.Rptr. 488, 535 P.2d 352]) and a unanimous verdict {People v. Feagley (1975) 14 Cal.3d 338, 349-358 [121 Cal.Rptr. 509, 535 P.2d 373]). In each case we expressly left open the question whether a person subjected to involuntary commitment proceedings as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ivan v. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. BurnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. Gary W.California Supreme Court · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.