Legal Opinion

In re Trummer

California Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1964No. Crim. No. 7413PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This matter is before us on an order to show cause issued upon an application for writ of habeas corpus filed on behalf of George Joseph Trummer (hereinafter referred to as petitioner) who is presently on parole from the California Rehabilitation Center under an order for commitment as a narcotics addict entered by the superior court pursuant to article 2, chapter 11, title 7, of part III of the Penal Code (in particular, § 6451, which deals with commitment to that facility of a person convicted of “any crime in any superior court”).

Petitioner first contends that chapter 11, title 7, part…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Katzev v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Sykes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Carl G. Gerchman v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API