Legal Opinion

Spackman v. Good

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1966No. Civ. 7913PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and from the judgment awarding damages upon a complaint alleging willful injury from misconduct causing emotional and mental distress and disturbance.

The plaintiffs, Suzanne and Paul, were born, respectively, on July 28, 1946, and Sept. 20, 1948; when defendant’s alleged misconduct occurred were 15 and 13 years of age; at the time of trial were 17 and 15; and now are 20 and almost 18.

One of the unusual facets of the case is the fact that these minors, who are the real parties in interest, 1 testified…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Alsteen v. GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Samms v. EcclesUtah Supreme Court · 1961

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sheltra v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. Golden v. DunganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API