People v. O'Neil
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of driving while addicted to a narcotic drug in violation of Vehicle Code section 23105. The primary issue in this ease turns upon the definition of the term “addicted” in section 23105. Since we find that the trial court erred in its formulation of that term, we must reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a determination of whether the defendant is “addicted” to the use of narcotics as we have defined that term in People v. Victor (1965) ante, pp. 280, 302-305 [42 Cal.Rptr. 199, 398 P.2d 391]; i.e., whether he exhibits the three…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. KimbleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. BernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by26 opinions
- Elder v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. BruceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. ChrismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.