Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1961No. Crim. 3955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Our first task, here, is to determine if an involuntary admission induced by a person not officially connected with the prosecution may be admitted into evidence. Although no California case expressly so states, we think that such admission is inadmissible if rendered to a person whom the defendant reasonably believes has been designated by the prosecuting officers as one whose promises will probably be fulfilled. As we shall explain, appellant’s admission here meets the test; it should not have been accepted into evidence.

Our second problem centers upon whether appellant suffered the double…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. BrommelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,948 United States of America v. Alan C. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. People v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. BolesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API