Legal Opinion
People v. Armstrong
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1968No. Crim. 14504PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
Defendant was charged with a violation of Penal Code, section 261, subdivision 3, in count I, and a violation of Penal Code, section 288a in count II. Prior convictions were alleged and admitted. . Defendant pled not guilty. Defendant was tried by a jury and found guilty on both counts. He was sentenced to state prison on each count. He filed a notice of appeal in propria persona.
The victim was at a laundromat on July 20, 1967, washing clothes. She had her three-week old baby with her. Defendant entered, approached the victim and told her that she must make love to him or he would rape her.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. KitchensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. NederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. DelgadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. HurdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.