Legal Opinion

People v. Trout

California Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1960No. Crim. 6631PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

A jury found defendant guilty of robbery of the first degree and kidnaping for the purpose of robbery. Defendant’s principal contention is that an oral confession which he gave to the police was involuntary and that the court therefore erred in receiving evidence on the subject.

On December 22, 1957, about 8 p. m., an armed man, subsequently identified as Allen Heeht, forced his way into the home of Blaine Groo, the manager of a market in Oaldand. Heeht summoned a second gunman, whom he called “Ralph,” and the two men compelled Mr. and Mrs. Groo to go with them to the market. On the way Heeht…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Stroble v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. People v. AtchleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. BerveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. MatlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API