Legal Opinion

Graham v. Perry

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

We have not attempted to make an exhaustive statement of the facts, but only such facts as are necessary to present the questions decisive of the case. The principal proposition urged by the plaintiff upon this trial is that the administratrix of the estate of Henry E. Graham represents creditors; that the failure of the mortgagees and their assigns to file renewal affidavits rendered the mortgages void and of no effect as to creditors, and that the defendant Knudson Sales Company had no lien upon the proceeds of the property sold under the stipulation.

There are two sections of the statutes…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Stewart v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Holt v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Eastman v. ParkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Roseliep v. HerroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Leffek v. LuedemanMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. In Re BaumgartnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  4. Worthington Corp. v. MoskowitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Grebe v. Wheeler Catering Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API