Legal Opinion
Worthington Corp. v. Moskowitz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1963PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
This appeal presents the following three issues:(1) Does sec. 241.26, Stats., require filing of a consignment agreement when consignment and delivery are initially for the purpose of fulfilling rental agreements between the consignee and third-party lessees, but ultimately for the purpose of increasing the probability of sale (upon approval by the consignor) to the lessees ?(2) Does a ch. 128 receiver obtain title to property consigned to’ the assignor, by reason of consignor’s failure to record the consignment agreement pursuant to sec. 241.26, Stats. ?(3) Is ch. 128, Stats.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Skilton v. . CodingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Neylan v. VorwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Lewis E. Solomon, Trustee of the Estate of Northwood Millwork, Inc., a Corporation, Bankrupt v. Northwestern State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Industry to Industry, Inc. v. Hillsman Modular Molding, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Estate of Kersten v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.